<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple Universes?! Hooey!&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/</link>
	<description>Mashup of science, business, technology, and channeling inner geekness!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn Wessel</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn Wessel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=181#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Multi-universe theory, not so strange just as,
 
Adam was a primate:
 
Adam/man (translation = ruddy/red) = soul (Gen. 2:7 - the &#039;animal&#039; sentiment principle &#039;only&#039;) = &#039;brute&#039; animal (which &#039;had&#039; to have been a &#039;primate&#039; because of Genome and other &#039;evidence&#039;).
 
It came from the &#039;dust&#039; of the &#039;ground&#039; (synonyms = powder, mortar, earth, red dirt, &#039;mud&#039;) at a time when the earth was &#039;hot&#039; (Gen. 2:4 - the translation of day is &#039;to be hot&#039;). 
 
There is no difference between what evolution teaches (early life evolved from the hot primordial soup/mud) and what the Bible shows.
 
At some time after its evolution from the primordial soup this creature wandered into a garden (another realm, Gen. 2:8 = Quantum Physics says our reality is more akin to a hologram/pixels generated from somewhere else) and got &#039;God&#039;s image (aura/&#039;supernatural&#039; spirit/&#039;higher consciousness&#039;/sixth sense, etc.). 
 
This had to have been an &#039;accident&#039; because if God had chosen the creature, surely he would have picked one that was not sometimes prone to violent behaviour and had polygamous tendencies!
 
Evolution teaches that at some time (un)favourable conditions existed that forced certain primates to &#039;evolve&#039;. Those conditions no longer exist thus the reason why primates are not still evolving.
 
I want to challenge that view. The reason we are not seeing it is because according to Bible writings, this change only occurred to one primate, Adam.
 
Before the garden (and in the garden), in its initial state, Adam was an &#039;it (asexual)&#039;. Male/female was a later bi-product. 
It left the garden (Adam could not find a comparable/&#039;same species&#039; mate among the garden creatures, Gen. 2:18-20). At that time a female was produced that came directly from its body. In other words &#039;it gave birth to her&#039;.
 
She came from its rib (translation = as curved, which can just as easily mean a strand of DNA as the double-helix &#039;curves&#039;). She was &#039;bone of my bones&#039; (plural/not one bone as in a &#039;single&#039; rib) and &#039;flesh of my flesh&#039; (Gen. 2:23). Therefore, she came from &#039;flesh&#039; and &#039;bone&#039;, not just &#039;bone&#039;. 
 
After her birth, Adam was referred to in the &#039;masculine&#039;, she in the &#039;feminine&#039; (all the &#039;female&#039; genes were pooled into her).
 
When Adam left the other realm the first time it had changed a great deal as the garden causes &#039;changes&#039;. Its higher consciousness/spirit died = &#039;deep&#039; sleep, Gen. 2:21. However, it was no longer the same creature it had been when it had first wandered into the garden. 

It was still asexual but was physically different; Neanderthal (red). When his offspring matured it mated with her and other Neanderthals were produced (they were more animalistic in this phase and if no other primates were around, would have mated with each other).
 
Neanderthal Adam somehow returned to the garden with his Neanderthal female (we don&#039;t know how long they were there in earth time). When they were forced to leave for the second time however, they were clothed with &#039;skin&#039; (fur was gone because they didn&#039;t need it anymore - Gen. 3:21) = they had changed again, Homo sapien.
 
Fossil evidence would show a physical evolution of three stages. When in reality they evolved &#039;because&#039; of &#039;supernatural influence&#039; they had gained when Adam entered the garden and got &#039;God&#039;s spirit&#039;.
 
The other primates (and other animals of the earth) are not evolving because they do not have God&#039;s image! 
The garden is timeless so we have no idea how old Adam/man (it) was in the garden for the first duration. Nor do we know how long Adam and his wife were in the garden before they were forced to leave. It was apparently a very long time as science tells us that the earth is very old.
 
Adam was the original &#039;it&#039;, also &#039;Neanderthal (missing link)&#039; and the &#039;first Homo Sapien&#039; - all three at various stages.
 
The human line came from one primate and its mate. Their offspring, the Neanderthals, were still on the earth when Adam and Eve returned to mortal earth. Thus Neanderthal and Homo-sapien existed for a time together as fossil evidence shows.
 
For whatever reason, Neanderthalis disappeared and Homo-sapien became the dominant species.

Things are not as they appear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multi-universe theory, not so strange just as,</p>
<p>Adam was a primate:</p>
<p>Adam/man (translation = ruddy/red) = soul (Gen. 2:7 &#8211; the &#8216;animal&#8217; sentiment principle &#8216;only&#8217;) = &#8216;brute&#8217; animal (which &#8216;had&#8217; to have been a &#8216;primate&#8217; because of Genome and other &#8216;evidence&#8217;).</p>
<p>It came from the &#8216;dust&#8217; of the &#8216;ground&#8217; (synonyms = powder, mortar, earth, red dirt, &#8216;mud&#8217;) at a time when the earth was &#8216;hot&#8217; (Gen. 2:4 &#8211; the translation of day is &#8216;to be hot&#8217;). </p>
<p>There is no difference between what evolution teaches (early life evolved from the hot primordial soup/mud) and what the Bible shows.</p>
<p>At some time after its evolution from the primordial soup this creature wandered into a garden (another realm, Gen. 2:8 = Quantum Physics says our reality is more akin to a hologram/pixels generated from somewhere else) and got &#8216;God&#8217;s image (aura/&#8217;supernatural&#8217; spirit/&#8217;higher consciousness&#8217;/sixth sense, etc.). </p>
<p>This had to have been an &#8216;accident&#8217; because if God had chosen the creature, surely he would have picked one that was not sometimes prone to violent behaviour and had polygamous tendencies!</p>
<p>Evolution teaches that at some time (un)favourable conditions existed that forced certain primates to &#8216;evolve&#8217;. Those conditions no longer exist thus the reason why primates are not still evolving.</p>
<p>I want to challenge that view. The reason we are not seeing it is because according to Bible writings, this change only occurred to one primate, Adam.</p>
<p>Before the garden (and in the garden), in its initial state, Adam was an &#8216;it (asexual)&#8217;. Male/female was a later bi-product.<br />
It left the garden (Adam could not find a comparable/&#8217;same species&#8217; mate among the garden creatures, Gen. 2:18-20). At that time a female was produced that came directly from its body. In other words &#8216;it gave birth to her&#8217;.</p>
<p>She came from its rib (translation = as curved, which can just as easily mean a strand of DNA as the double-helix &#8216;curves&#8217;). She was &#8216;bone of my bones&#8217; (plural/not one bone as in a &#8216;single&#8217; rib) and &#8216;flesh of my flesh&#8217; (Gen. 2:23). Therefore, she came from &#8216;flesh&#8217; and &#8216;bone&#8217;, not just &#8216;bone&#8217;. </p>
<p>After her birth, Adam was referred to in the &#8216;masculine&#8217;, she in the &#8216;feminine&#8217; (all the &#8216;female&#8217; genes were pooled into her).</p>
<p>When Adam left the other realm the first time it had changed a great deal as the garden causes &#8216;changes&#8217;. Its higher consciousness/spirit died = &#8216;deep&#8217; sleep, Gen. 2:21. However, it was no longer the same creature it had been when it had first wandered into the garden. </p>
<p>It was still asexual but was physically different; Neanderthal (red). When his offspring matured it mated with her and other Neanderthals were produced (they were more animalistic in this phase and if no other primates were around, would have mated with each other).</p>
<p>Neanderthal Adam somehow returned to the garden with his Neanderthal female (we don&#8217;t know how long they were there in earth time). When they were forced to leave for the second time however, they were clothed with &#8216;skin&#8217; (fur was gone because they didn&#8217;t need it anymore &#8211; Gen. 3:21) = they had changed again, Homo sapien.</p>
<p>Fossil evidence would show a physical evolution of three stages. When in reality they evolved &#8216;because&#8217; of &#8216;supernatural influence&#8217; they had gained when Adam entered the garden and got &#8216;God&#8217;s spirit&#8217;.</p>
<p>The other primates (and other animals of the earth) are not evolving because they do not have God&#8217;s image!<br />
The garden is timeless so we have no idea how old Adam/man (it) was in the garden for the first duration. Nor do we know how long Adam and his wife were in the garden before they were forced to leave. It was apparently a very long time as science tells us that the earth is very old.</p>
<p>Adam was the original &#8216;it&#8217;, also &#8216;Neanderthal (missing link)&#8217; and the &#8216;first Homo Sapien&#8217; &#8211; all three at various stages.</p>
<p>The human line came from one primate and its mate. Their offspring, the Neanderthals, were still on the earth when Adam and Eve returned to mortal earth. Thus Neanderthal and Homo-sapien existed for a time together as fossil evidence shows.</p>
<p>For whatever reason, Neanderthalis disappeared and Homo-sapien became the dominant species.</p>
<p>Things are not as they appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rewriting the Book of Physics &#124; The Logic of Science</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Rewriting the Book of Physics &#124; The Logic of Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=181#comment-216</guid>
		<description>[...] couldn&#8217;t agree more.  I wrote a previous post on just this subject and, in another post, Sir Roger Penrose is interviewed discussing the same [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couldn&#8217;t agree more.  I wrote a previous post on just this subject and, in another post, Sir Roger Penrose is interviewed discussing the same [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interview with Roger Penrose &#124; The Logic of Science</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Interview with Roger Penrose &#124; The Logic of Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=181#comment-212</guid>
		<description>[...] posted my thoughts on this subject a while back (which is in line with Penrose&#8217;s&#8230;), and it&#8217;s always [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posted my thoughts on this subject a while back (which is in line with Penrose&#8217;s&#8230;), and it&#8217;s always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

