<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science &#38;... &#187; More Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micfarris.com/category/more-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micfarris.com</link>
	<description>Mashup of science, business, technology, and channeling inner geekness!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NKS Now Available on the iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/09/nks-now-available-on-the-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/09/nks-now-available-on-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NKS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Wolfram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like Stephen Wolfram&#8217;s book A New Kind of Science (or NKS for short) &#8211; on how simple computational programs can create amazingly complex things.  I&#8217;m also really enamored with the iPad (I&#8217;ve written about it before a number of times&#8230;). Now, two of my favorite things are coming together &#8211; Wolfram&#8217;s NKS is<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/09/nks-now-available-on-the-ipad/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/NKS-on-the-iPad.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-610" title="NKS on the iPad" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/NKS-on-the-iPad-220x300.png" alt="" width="220" height="300" /></a>I really like Stephen Wolfram&#8217;s book <a title="Stephen Wolfram's A New Kind of Science" href="http://www.wolframscience.com/nksonline/toc.html" target="_blank"><em>A New Kind of Science</em> </a>(or NKS for short) &#8211; on how simple computational programs can create amazingly complex things.  I&#8217;m also really enamored with the iPad (I&#8217;ve written about it <a title="Newsweek on iPad: Having It Both Ways" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/newsweek-on-ipad-having-it-both-ways/" target="_blank">before a number</a> <a title="Apple's iPad is Here" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/01/apples-ipad-is-here/" target="_blank">of</a> times&#8230;).</p>
<p>Now, two of my favorite things are coming together &#8211; Wolfram&#8217;s NKS is <a title="Stephen Wolfram: A New Kind of Science for the iPad" href="http://www.wolfram-media.com/products/nksipad.html" target="_blank">now available on the iPad</a>.  It&#8217;s available at <a title="NKS on iTunes" href="itms://itunes.apple.com/us/app/stephen-wolfram-a-new-kind/id390711826?mt=8" target="_blank">Apple&#8217;s iTunes store</a> for $9.99 &#8211; far less than the hardback version and certainly much lighter!&#8230;  (Hmmm&#8230;  Two things coming together &#8211; kind of like chocolate and peanut butter in a Reese&#8217;s Peanut Butter Cup&#8230;)</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t purchased an iPad yet, but now I&#8217;m really excited to think about possibly maybe starting to look into getting one&#8230; (or at least window shopping for one&#8230;)</p>
<p>Read more about <em>A New Kind of Science</em> for the iPad on Stephen Wolfram&#8217;s blog <a title="A New Kind of Science is on the iPad!" href="http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2010/09/a-new-kind-of-science-is-on-the-ipad/" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/01/apples-ipad-is-here/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Apple&#8217;s iPad is Here</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/another-ipad-convert/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Another iPad Convert</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/newsweek-on-ipad-having-it-both-ways/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Newsweek on iPad: Having It Both Ways</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/11/popular-science-wolfram-on-big-data/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Popular Science:  Wolfram on Big Data</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/video-30-years-of-apple-in-2-minutes/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VIDEO: 30 Years of Apple in 2 Minutes</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/09/nks-now-available-on-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Betelgeuse Explosion?</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/betelgeuse-explosion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/betelgeuse-explosion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s almost like a cosmic hurricane warning signal&#8230;  From Bad Astronomy:  &#8220;So, what’s the deal with Betelgeuse? What is it, will it explode, and if so, when?&#8221; The constellation Orion&#8217;s biggest star is Betelgeuse (pronounced &#8220;beetle-juice&#8221;), a red supergiant, and it&#8217;s one of the brightest stars in the sky - that&#8217;s the &#8220;what&#8221;.   Will it explode? <a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/betelgeuse-explosion/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/betel_a.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-549" title="betel_a" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/betel_a-300x206.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="206" /></a>It&#8217;s almost like a cosmic hurricane warning signal&#8230;  From <a title="Bad Astronomy" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/" target="_blank">Bad Astronomy</a>:  &#8220;So, what’s the deal with Betelgeuse? What is it, will it explode, and if so, when?&#8221;</p>
<p>The constellation Orion&#8217;s biggest star is <a title="Betelgeuse - Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betelgeuse" target="_blank">Betelgeuse</a> (pronounced &#8220;beetle-juice&#8221;), a red supergiant, and it&#8217;s one of the brightest stars in the sky - that&#8217;s the &#8220;what&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Will it explode?  Well, according to some observers, the star is not round, and it&#8217;s getting smaller.  This could be the signs of Betelgeuse heading toward a supernova phase, but it also could be explained away by large sunspots that fool our observations.</p>
<p>Bad Astronomy seems to think that this is likely an astronomical doomsday rumor.  It may be interesting only because it&#8217;s close to the 2012 doomsday date that is the end of the Mayan calendar.  But read the <a title="Is Betelgeuse about to blow?" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/01/is-betelgeuse-about-to-blow/" target="_blank">Bad Astronomy article</a> for yourself to get the best information on the topic.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/could-dark-matter-theory-be-dead/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Could Dark Matter Theory Be Dead?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/why-nbaers-dont-shoot-underhand/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why NBAers Don&#8217;t Shoot Underhand</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/rewriting-the-book-of-physics/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Rewriting the Book of Physics</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/11/kontagent-closes-12m-big-data-helps-nextgen-science/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Kontagent closes $12M, Big Data Helps NextGen Science</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/game-theory-and-the-health-care-debate/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Game Theory and the Health Care Debate</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/betelgeuse-explosion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Dark Matter Theory Be Dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/could-dark-matter-theory-be-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/could-dark-matter-theory-be-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supernova]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent discovery of a new supernova may lead to questions about dark matter theory. Science aficionados know that there appears to be more gravitational attraction than can be explained by the matter that we can see. So, in order for the extra gravity to be there, it&#8217;s been theorized that there must be extra matter<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/could-dark-matter-theory-be-dead/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/supernova.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-542" title="supernova" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/supernova.jpg" alt="" width="282" height="275" /></a>Recent discovery of a new supernova may lead to questions about dark matter theory. Science aficionados know that there appears to be more gravitational attraction than can be explained by the matter that we can see. So, in order for the extra gravity to be there, it&#8217;s been theorized that there must be extra matter that we can&#8217;t see &#8211; in other words, &#8220;<a title="Wikipedia - Dark Matter" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter" target="_blank">dark matter</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p>However, this new supernova discovery may shine some light on the darkness.  Apparently, this supernova is spewing calcuim and titanium, and while most <a title="Supernova is rich in calcium" href="http://articles.latimes.com/2010/may/19/science/la-sci-supernova-20100520" target="_blank">reports</a> are focusing on the calcium, it is thought that the much heavier element titanium is the interesting part.  This titanium, which is radioactive and emits positrons as it decays, could be the source of what had previously been attributed to dark matter particles colliding.  If these types of supernovae are creating such an abundance of radioactive heavy elements in the universe, this could help explain the supposed dark matter signatures.</p>
<p>For more info on this subject, <a title="New Supernova Discovery Nixes Dark Matter Theory" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/05/-new-supernova-class-may-undermine-dark-matter-search.html" target="_blank">here&#8217;s</a> a post from Casey Kazan from <a title="The Daily Galaxy" href="http://www.dailygalaxy.com" target="_blank">The Daily Galaxy</a> on the new supernova, and the original post from <a title="ANIL ANANTHASWAMY" href="http://www.sciencefactory.co.uk/content/authors.php?aid=84" target="_blank">Anil Ananthaswamy</a> at <a title="New Scientist" href="http://www.newscientist.com" target="_blank">New Scientist</a> is <a title="New supernova class may undermine dark matter search " href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/05/new-supernova-class-may-underm.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/02/search-for-dark-matter-is-on/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Search for Dark Matter is ON!</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/betelgeuse-explosion/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Betelgeuse Explosion?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/02/one-scientists-search-for-the-meaning-of-time/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">One Scientist&#8217;s Search for The Meaning of Time</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Multiple Universes?! Hooey!&#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/copernicium-the-newest-element/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Copernicium &#8211; The Newest Element</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/could-dark-matter-theory-be-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review:  &#8220;The Perfect Swarm&#8221; by Len Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/book-review-the-perfect-swarm-by-len-fisher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/book-review-the-perfect-swarm-by-len-fisher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love to read, and I especially love to read nonfiction books that help me understand how the world works.  So, I&#8217;m going to be providing reviews of some of the books that I&#8217;ve been reading lately, and let you in on why I like (or don&#8217;t like) them and what I&#8217;m learning. Recently I<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/book-review-the-perfect-swarm-by-len-fisher/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?lt1=_blank&#038;bc1=FFFFFF&#038;IS2=1&#038;nou=1&#038;bg1=FFFFFF&#038;fc1=000000&#038;lc1=0000FF&#038;t=indepvalueinv-20&#038;o=1&#038;p=8&#038;l=as1&#038;m=amazon&#038;f=ifr&#038;md=10FE9736YVPPT7A0FBG2&#038;asins=046501884X" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="10" marginheight="10" frameborder="0" align="left"></iframe>
<p>I love to read, and I especially love to read nonfiction books that help me understand how the world works.  So, I&#8217;m going to be providing reviews of some of the books that I&#8217;ve been reading lately, and let you in on why I like (or don&#8217;t like) them and what I&#8217;m learning.</p>
<p>Recently I picked up a copy of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046501884X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=indepvalueinv-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=046501884X"><em>The Perfect Swarm</em></a><em><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=indepvalueinv-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=046501884X" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> </em>by Len Fisher, Ph.D., which focuses on the science of complexity in everyday life  Dr. Fisher has also written books on game theory in real life (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465009387?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=indepvalueinv-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0465009387"><em>Rock, Paper, Scissors</em></a><em><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=indepvalueinv-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0465009387" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></em>) and the optimal way to dunk a doughnut (aptly named <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0753817055?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=indepvalueinv-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0753817055"><em>How to Dunk a Doughnut</em></a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=indepvalueinv-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0753817055" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" />).  It turns out that Fisher was awarded the <a title="Ig Nobel Prize" href="http://improbable.com/ig/" target="_blank">Ig Nobel Prize</a> for the dunking donut work &#8211; the award is usually reserved for work that just plain bad, but Fisher has apparently turned his lemon into lemonade&#8230;</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046501884X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=indepvalueinv-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=046501884X"><em>The Perfect Swarm</em></a>, Fisher describes how bees, ants, locusts, and fish use swarm intelligence to guide group movements and to help in the search for food.  Humans use swarm intelligence as well, and Fisher describes multiple interesting ways that we can take advantage of these concepts to make better judgments in everyday life.  Here&#8217;s just some of the interesting concepts and principles that come out of his analysis of complexity:</p>
<ul>
<li>To move a group in the direction you want (for example, within a company), lead from the inside, but take care not to let other members of the group know what you are doing.  Just head in the direction that you want to go, and leave it to the laws of the swarm to do the rest.</li>
<li>If you are in a crowd in a dangerous situation, use a mixed strategy for escape; follow the crowd 60 percent of the time, and spend the other 40 percent searching out escape routes on your own.</li>
<li>If you want to persuade a large group of people, or even start a craze, don&#8217;t rely on persuading someone with influence to pass the message on.  It is far better to try for a critical mass of early adopters &#8211; people who will take the idea or product up after a single exposure.</li>
<li>When confronted with a mass of data that you need to use as the basis of a decision, furst use <a title="Benford's Law" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford's_law" target="_blank">Benford&#8217;s Law</a> to check that the data haven&#8217;t been faked.</li>
<li>Avoid the perils of groupthink by escaping temporarily from the group environment, doing some independent thinking, and committing yourself to the conclusions of that thinking before returning to the group.</li>
<li>Spread your bets evenly.  Instead of choosing one alternative over another, allocate your resources equally to each.</li>
</ul>
<p>And here&#8217;s a really interesting one &#8211; especially if you are hiring someone in your company:</p>
<ul>
<li>If you want to give yourself the best chance of choosing the very best option in a situation that doesn&#8217;t allow you to go back to the options that you have rejected, look at 37 percent of those available, then choose the next one that is better than any of them.  This will give you a 1 in 3 chance of finding the best option, and a very high chance of finding one in the top few percent.</li>
</ul>
<p>I am incredibly interested in systems that have simple rules yet create complex behavior.  The world can be modeled as a system using simple rules, and Fisher is quite effective in showing us some interesting and useful things that come from looking at these systems.  It&#8217;s a good read, interesting to understand the concepts he&#8217;s getting across, and, I would say, worth the time.  You can pick up a copy of <em>The Perfect Swarm</em> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/046501884X?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=indepvalueinv-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=046501884X">here</a>&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/11/dart-throwing-chimp-talks-data-science/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Dart-Throwing Chimp Talks Data Science</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/10-deadly-presentation-pitfalls-to-avoid/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">10 Deadly Presentation Pitfalls to Avoid</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/how-to-create-a-powerful-first-impression/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">How To Create A Powerful First Impression</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/the-perfect-is-the-enemy-of-the-good/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/job-interview-presentations-making-it-easy/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Job Interview Presentations &#8211; Making It Easy</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/book-review-the-perfect-swarm-by-len-fisher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video:  Stephen Wolfram &#8211; Computing a Theory of Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/video-stephen-wolfram-computing-a-theory-of-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/video-stephen-wolfram-computing-a-theory-of-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Wolfram]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Wolfram recently gave a talk about his efforts to understand the universe around us through computation.  He&#8217;s the CEO and founder of Wolfram Research, creator of Mathematica, and author of A New Kind of Science.  Wolfram recently launches his computational knowledge engine, Wolfram&#124;Alpha (I wrote a post about its launch some time back&#8230;).  Here&#8217;s the video<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/video-stephen-wolfram-computing-a-theory-of-everything/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Wolfram recently gave a talk about his efforts to understand the universe around us through computation.  He&#8217;s the CEO and founder of Wolfram Research, creator of <a title="Mathematica - Wolfram Research" href="http://www.wolfram.com" target="_blank">Mathematica</a>, and author of <a title="A New Kind of Science" href="http://www.wolframscience.com" target="_blank">A New Kind of Science</a>.  Wolfram recently launches his computational knowledge engine, <a title="Wolfram|Alpha" href="http://www.wolframalpha.com" target="_blank">Wolfram|Alpha</a> (I wrote a <a title="The Launch of Wolfram|Alpha" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/the-launch-of-wolframalpha/" target="_blank">post</a> about its launch some time back&#8230;). </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the video of his talk, given at a recent <a title="TED - Ideas Worth Spreading" href="http://www.ted.com/" target="_blank">TED conference</a>&#8230;<br />
<!--copy and paste--><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="446" height="326" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="bgColor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="flashvars" value="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/StephenWolfram_2010-medium.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/StephenWolfram-2010.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=843&amp;introDuration=16500&amp;adDuration=4000&amp;postAdDuration=2000&amp;adKeys=talk=stephen_wolfram_computing_a_theory_of_everything;year=2010;theme=numbers_at_play;theme=art_unusual;theme=inspired_by_nature;theme=a_taste_of_ted2010;theme=unconventional_explanations;theme=tales_of_invention;theme=bold_predictions_stern_warnings;theme=new_on_ted_com;event=TED2010;&amp;preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;" /><param name="src" value="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="446" height="326" src="http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#ffffff" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" flashvars="vu=http://video.ted.com/talks/dynamic/StephenWolfram_2010-medium.flv&amp;su=http://images.ted.com/images/ted/tedindex/embed-posters/StephenWolfram-2010.embed_thumbnail.jpg&amp;vw=432&amp;vh=240&amp;ap=0&amp;ti=843&amp;introDuration=16500&amp;adDuration=4000&amp;postAdDuration=2000&amp;adKeys=talk=stephen_wolfram_computing_a_theory_of_everything;year=2010;theme=numbers_at_play;theme=art_unusual;theme=inspired_by_nature;theme=a_taste_of_ted2010;theme=unconventional_explanations;theme=tales_of_invention;theme=bold_predictions_stern_warnings;theme=new_on_ted_com;event=TED2010;&amp;preAdTag=tconf.ted/embed;tile=1;sz=512x288;"></embed></object><br />
Watch and learn!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/10-quirky-science-tricks/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">10 Quirky Science Tricks</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/video-star-wars-trilogy-in-two-minutes-with-legos/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Video:  Star Wars Trilogy in Two Minutes&#8230; With Legos!</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/10/steve-jobs-explains-the-rules-of-success/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Steve Jobs Explains the Rules of Success</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/06/video-30-years-of-apple-in-2-minutes/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">VIDEO: 30 Years of Apple in 2 Minutes</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/11/popular-science-wolfram-on-big-data/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Popular Science:  Wolfram on Big Data</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/video-stephen-wolfram-computing-a-theory-of-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Universe Just Got Bigger</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/the-universe-just-got-bigger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/the-universe-just-got-bigger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Nancy Atkinson posted on Universe Today that astronomers are now understanding why they&#8217;ve missed 90% of the observable galaxies, and, with new tools, are now able to see them. Here&#8217;s a paragraph from Atkinson&#8217;s article: &#8220;Astronomers have long known that many surveys of distant galaxies miss 90% of their targets, but they didn&#8217;t<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/the-universe-just-got-bigger/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/universe-ii.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-393" title="universe-ii" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/universe-ii-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>Last week, Nancy Atkinson posted on <a title="Universe Today" href="http://www.universetoday.com" target="_blank">Universe Today</a> that astronomers are now understanding why they&#8217;ve missed 90% of the observable galaxies, and, with new tools, are now able to see them.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a paragraph from Atkinson&#8217;s <a title="Astronomers Find 90% More Universe!" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2010/03/24/astronomers-find-90-more-universe/" target="_blank">article</a>:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>&#8220;Astronomers have long known that many </em><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2010/03/24/astronomers-find-90-more-universe/#" target="_blank"><em>surveys</em></a><em> of distant </em><a rel="external" href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/galaxies/"><em>galaxies</em></a><em> miss 90% of their targets, but they didn&#8217;t know why. Now, astronomers have determined that a large fraction of galaxies whose light took 10 billion years to reach us have gone undiscovered. This was found with an extremely deep </em><a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2010/03/24/astronomers-find-90-more-universe/#" target="_blank"><em>survey</em></a><em> using two of the four giant 8.2-meter </em><a rel="external" href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/telescopes/"><em>telescopes</em></a><em> that make up ESO’s Very Large </em><a rel="external" href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/telescopes/"><em>Telescope</em></a><em> (VLT) and a unique custom-built filter. The survey also helped uncover some of the faintest galaxies ever found at this early stage of the </em><a rel="external" href="http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/the-universe/"><em>Universe</em></a><em>.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">You can read the Universe Today article <a title="Astronomers Find 90% More Universe!" href="http://www.universetoday.com/2010/03/24/astronomers-find-90-more-universe/" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/01/pictures-of-a-toddler-universe/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Pictures of a Toddler (Universe)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/02/search-for-dark-matter-is-on/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Search for Dark Matter is ON!</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/challenge-the-current-wisdom-and-change-the-world/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Challenge the Current Wisdom and Change the World</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/interview-with-roger-penrose/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Interview with Roger Penrose</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/rewriting-the-book-of-physics/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Rewriting the Book of Physics</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/04/the-universe-just-got-bigger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copernicium &#8211; The Newest Element</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/copernicium-the-newest-element/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/copernicium-the-newest-element/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Element 112 has an official name &#8211; Copernicium &#8211; named after the 16th-century Polish scientist Nicholas Copernicus, who first theorized that the Earth revolved around the Sun.  Copernicium&#8217;s periodic element symbol is Cn. While the name was announced some time back, it became official only recently. Wonder how this would look in the periodic table<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/copernicium-the-newest-element/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/copernicus.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-371" title="copernicus" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/copernicus-257x300.jpg" alt="" width="257" height="300" /></a>Element 112 has an official name &#8211; Copernicium &#8211; named after the 16th-century Polish scientist <a title="Nicolas Copernicus " href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus" target="_blank">Nicholas Copernicus</a>, who first theorized that the Earth revolved around the Sun.  Copernicium&#8217;s periodic element symbol is Cn.</p>
<p>While the name was announced <a title="Newly Discovered Element 112 Named &quot;Copernicum&quot; " href="http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-07/element-112-named-copernicum" target="_blank">some time back</a>, it became official only recently.</p>
<p>Wonder how this would look in <a title="The Periodic Table of Periodic Tables" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/the-periodic-table-of-periodic-tables/" target="_blank">the periodic table of periodic tables</a>?&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the Los Angeles Times article about Copernicium and the other most recently named elements <a title="Meet the periodic table's newest resident: copernicium" href="http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-elements31-2010mar31,0,5578686.story" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/the-periodic-table-of-periodic-tables/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Periodic Table of Periodic Tables</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/challenge-the-current-wisdom-and-change-the-world/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Challenge the Current Wisdom and Change the World</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/05/could-dark-matter-theory-be-dead/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Could Dark Matter Theory Be Dead?</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/the-moon-is-alive/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">&#8220;The Moon Is Alive&#8221;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/unfriend/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">&#8220;Unfriend&#8221;&#8230;</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/copernicium-the-newest-element/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Proton Smasher Sets Record</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/update-proton-smasher-sets-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/update-proton-smasher-sets-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post, I mentioned that the Large Hadron Collider was starting their official research program, seeking to smash protons together in the 17-mile tunnel at energies of 7 trillion electron-volts (7 TeV). Well, they did it!  The record was officially achieved today, breaking its previous record. You can read more about the events<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/update-proton-smasher-sets-record/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/proton-smashing.bmp"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-362" title="proton-smashing" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/proton-smashing.bmp" alt="" width="206" height="195" /></a>In a previous <a title="New Record Sought for Proton Smashing" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/new-record-sought-for-proton-smashing/" target="_blank">post</a>, I mentioned that the <a title="Large Hadron Collider" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider" target="_blank">Large Hadron Collider</a> was starting their <a title="Search for Higgs Keeps Going" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/search-for-higgs-keeps-going/" target="_blank">official research program</a>, seeking to smash protons together in the 17-mile tunnel at energies of 7 trillion electron-volts (7 TeV).</p>
<p>Well, they did it!  The record was officially achieved today, breaking its previous record.</p>
<p>You can read more about the events at CERN <a title="Geneva atom smasher sets collision record" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36097721/ns/technology_and_science-science/" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/new-record-sought-for-proton-smashing/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">New Record Sought for Proton Smashing</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/search-for-higgs-keeps-going/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Search for Higgs Keeps Going</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/02/one-scientists-search-for-the-meaning-of-time/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">One Scientist&#8217;s Search for The Meaning of Time</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/10/popular-science-the-glory-of-big-data/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Popular Science:  The Glory of Big Data</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/11/zdnets-kusnetzky-on-big-data-and-more/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">ZDNet&#8217;s Kusnetzky on Big Data and More</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/update-proton-smasher-sets-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rewriting the Book of Physics</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/rewriting-the-book-of-physics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/rewriting-the-book-of-physics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discover Magazine has a really good article about some of today&#8217;s scientists that are trying to overthrow the conventional wisdom and find a more complete and accurate model for our universe. Isaac Newton presented his theory of universal gravitation in 1687, and Albert Einstein overthrew that explanation with his theory of general relativity in 1915. <a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/rewriting-the-book-of-physics/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/big-bang-625x450.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-355" title="big-bang-625x450" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/big-bang-625x450-300x216.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a><a title="Discover Magazine" href="http://www.discovermagazine.com" target="_blank">Discover Magazine</a> has a <a title="Discover Magazine - Who Wrote the Book of Physics?" href="http://discover.coverleaf.com/discovermagazine/201004/?pg=34#pg34" target="_blank">really good article</a> about some of today&#8217;s scientists that are trying to overthrow the conventional wisdom and find a more complete and accurate model for our universe.</p>
<p><a title="Isaac Newton" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton" target="_blank">Isaac Newton</a> presented his <a title="Newton's Theory of Universal Gravitation" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_law_of_universal_gravitation" target="_blank">theory of universal gravitation</a> in 1687, and <a title="Albert Einstein" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein" target="_blank">Albert Einstein</a> overthrew that explanation with his <a title="Einstein's Theory of General Relativity" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity" target="_blank">theory of general relativity</a> in 1915.  However, the efforts since Einstein, which include combinations of quantum mechanics and superstring theory, has left most of the scientific world wanting.</p>
<p>There is no doubt that <a title="Quantum Mechanics" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics" target="_blank">quantum mechanics</a> can predict much of the universe&#8217;s probabilistic weirdness.  However, <a title="String Theory" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory" target="_blank">string theory</a> demands multidimensional universes to work and predicts basically nothing.</p>
<p>The three physicists highlighted in the Discover article are <a title="Andreas Albrecht" href="http://www.physics.ucdavis.edu/Cosmology/albrecht/" target="_blank">Andreas Albrecht</a>, <a title="Lee Smolin" href="http://www.leesmolin.com/" target="_blank">Lee Smolin</a>, and <a title="Stuart Kauffman" href="http://stuartkauffman.com/" target="_blank">Stuart Kauffman</a>.  (I actually like Smolin&#8217;s book <a title="The Trouble With Physics" href="http://www.amazon.com/Trouble-Physics-String-Theory-Science/dp/0618551050" target="_blank">The Trouble With Physics</a> &#8211; worth a read&#8230;).  Here&#8217;s a mini-snipit from the Discover article:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>Physicists should not spin any theories that require the existence of things, such as multiverses, that cannot be disproved.</em></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  I wrote a <a title="Multiple Universes?!  Hooey!..." href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/" target="_blank">previous post</a> on just this subject and, in another <a title="Interview with Roger Penrose" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/interview-with-roger-penrose/" target="_blank">post</a>, Sir Roger Penrose is interviewed discussing the same thing.</p>
<p>Take a preview of the April 2010 Discover Magazine <a title="Discover Magazine - Who Wrote the Book of Physics?" href="http://discover.coverleaf.com/discovermagazine/201004/?pg=34#pg34" target="_blank">here</a> and read the article&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/interview-with-roger-penrose/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Interview with Roger Penrose</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/multiple-universes-hooey/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Multiple Universes?! Hooey!&#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/why-nbaers-dont-shoot-underhand/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why NBAers Don&#8217;t Shoot Underhand</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/einstein-and-eddington/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Einstein and Eddington</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/quantum-physics-supersized/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Quantum Physics Supersized</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/rewriting-the-book-of-physics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Record Sought for Proton Smashing</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/new-record-sought-for-proton-smashing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/new-record-sought-for-proton-smashing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[More Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 30, 2010, marks the date on which the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will attempt to break its own record for achieving energies near what was present at the Big Bang. Twin beams of protons, traveling with energies of 3.5 trillion electron-volts (TeV), will be directed at each other in the 17-mile round LHC, located underneath<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/new-record-sought-for-proton-smashing/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_321" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 306px"><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/lhc.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-321" title="lhc" src="http://www.micfarris.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/lhc.jpg" alt="" width="296" height="222" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Large Hadron Collider at CERN</p></div>
<p>March 30, 2010, marks the date on which the <a title="Large Hadron Collider" href="http://science.howstuffworks.com/large-hadron-collider.htm" target="_blank">Large Hadron Collider</a> (LHC) will attempt to break its own record for achieving energies near what was present at the Big Bang.</p>
<p>Twin beams of protons, traveling with energies of 3.5 trillion electron-volts (TeV), will be directed at each other in the 17-mile round LHC, located underneath the French-Swiss border at CERN.  According to CERN, this will mark the beginning of LHC&#8217;s official research program.</p>
<p>I posted their original landmark test <a title="Search for Higgs Keeps Going" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/search-for-higgs-keeps-going/" target="_blank">here</a>, and you can read more about their upcoming tests <a title="Physicists set schedule for Earth’s biggest bang" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36001153/ns/technology_and_science-science/" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/update-proton-smasher-sets-record/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Update: Proton Smasher Sets Record</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/12/search-for-higgs-keeps-going/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Search for Higgs Keeps Going</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/science-through-the-looking-glass/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Science Through The Looking Glass</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/02/three-cool-things-and-two-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Three Cool Things (and Two Bonuses)</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/scientists-go-gaga-over-antarctic-shrimp/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Scientists Go &#8216;Gaga&#8217;&#8230; Over Antarctic Shrimp</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/new-record-sought-for-proton-smashing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

