<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science &#38;... &#187; James Watson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micfarris.com/tag/james-watson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micfarris.com</link>
	<description>Mashup of science, business, technology, and channeling inner geekness!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>American Innovation and Pellet Power</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington Carver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonas Salk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orville and Wilbur Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin and Larry Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Edison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like I said in an earlier post, I thought this week&#8217;s Newsweek had a lot of great stuff&#8230;  Here are two articles with a scientific bent that I thought were neat.  The first article is by Fareed Zakaria, who asks Is America Losing Its Mojo?  Zakaria points to three tidals waves of innovation that made<a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/"> <br /><br /> (Read More...)</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said <a title="Odd Stats on Sarah Palin" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/odd-stats-on-sarah-palin/" target="_blank">in an earlier post</a>, I thought this week&#8217;s Newsweek had a lot of great stuff&#8230;  Here are two articles with a scientific bent that I thought were neat. </p>
<p>The first <a title="Is America Losing Its Mojo?" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/222836" target="_blank">article</a> is by Fareed Zakaria, who asks <em>Is America Losing Its Mojo?</em>  Zakaria points to three tidals waves of innovation that made America the world leaders in innovation. </p>
<p>The first was a wave of deconstruction in Europe in the aftermath of World War II &#8211; while Europe spent most of its resources rebuilding to get back to where they were before, America had the opportunity to push ahead with little competition.</p>
<p>The second wave, which was related to the first, was the influx of immigrants that fled Europe and took up residence in America&#8217;s universities and research centers.</p>
<p>The third wave came as a result of massive government funding, which led to and created markets for innovations such as the microprocessor, global positioning satellites, and the development of the Internet.</p>
<p>I see Zakaria&#8217;s point, but I&#8217;m not sure if America&#8217;s lead in the innovation space is really dead.  The the creation of the personal computer and the drive to use the Internet (and the software industries that came as a result) were American innovations, were distinct from these three waves, and changed the planet.</p>
<p>But what I did find interesting from this article was the list of great scientists that helped position America as the world&#8217;s innovation leader.  Here&#8217;s who was listed:</p>
<p><strong>Thomas Edison</strong> (1847-1931) &#8211; <em>Lightbulbs, phonograph</em><br />
<strong>Henry Ford</strong> (1863-1947) &#8211; <em>Assembly line<br />
</em><strong>George Washington Carver</strong> (c. 1864-1943) &#8211; <em>Crop rotation</em><br />
<strong>Orville</strong> (1871-1948) and <strong>Wilbur</strong> (1867-1912) <strong>Wright</strong> &#8211; <em>Airplane<br />
</em><strong>Willis Carver</strong> (1876-1950) &#8211; <em>Air conditioning</em><br />
<strong>Albert Einstein</strong> (1879-1955) &#8211; <em>Theory of relativity</em><br />
<strong>Charles Richard Drew</strong> (1940-50) &#8211; <em>Blood bank<br />
</em><strong>J. Robert Oppenheimer</strong> (1904-67) &#8211; <em>Atomic bomb</em><br />
<strong>Jonas Salk</strong> (1914-95) &#8211; <em>Polio vaccine</em><br />
<strong>Marion Donovan</strong> (1917-98) &#8211; <em>Disposable diapers<br />
</em><strong>Stephanie Kwolek</strong> (1923-  ) &#8211; <em>Kevlar</em><br />
<strong>James Watson</strong> (1928-  ) &#8211; <em>Structure of DNA<br />
</em><strong>Arthur Fry</strong> (1931-  ) &#8211; <em>Post-its<br />
</em><strong>Sergey Brin</strong> (1973-  ) and <strong>Larry Page</strong> (1973-  ) &#8211; <em>Google</em><br />
<strong>Ed Moses</strong> (1949-  ) &#8211; <em>Nuclear fusion</em> (which is the subject of the next article&#8230;)</p>
<p>The second <a title="Could This Lump Power the Planet?" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/222792" target="_blank">article</a> is by Daniel Lyons (aka <a title="The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs" href="http://www.fakesteve.net/" target="_blank">Fake Steve Jobs</a> &#8211; who hates Jobs, and I posted about his article on the iPhone <a title="Apple and 1984 All Over Again?" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/apple-and-1984-all-over-again/" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;) is on the quest for nuclear fusion power. </p>
<p>Nuclear fusion is the holy grail of energy, where a small pellet of deuterium and tritium (which are isotopes of hydrogen) hit with big lasers harnesses the energy-making power of the Sun.  The byproduct, as opposed to the radioactive waste of nuclear fission reactors or the greenhouse gases associated with burning fossil fuels, would merely be helium.</p>
<p>From the article, &#8220;<em>Fusion proponents claim that 10 gallons of water could produce as much energy as a supertanker of oil.</em>&#8220;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/01/lights-seen-from-faraway-planet/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Light Seen From Faraway Planet</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/apple-and-1984-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Apple and 1984 all over again?&#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/7-quick-qa-tips/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">7 Quick Q&#038;A Tips</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/why-nbaers-dont-shoot-underhand/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why NBAers Don&#8217;t Shoot Underhand</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2011/10/top-twelve-lessons-from-steve-jobs/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Top Twelve Lessons from Steve Jobs</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

