<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Science &#38;... &#124; Everything... From A Science Angle &#187; Orville and Wilbur Wright</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.micfarris.com/tag/orville-and-wilbur-wright/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.micfarris.com</link>
	<description>Everything... From A Science Angle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 22:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>American Innovation and Pellet Power</title>
		<link>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mic Farris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Washington Carver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Robert Oppenheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonas Salk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orville and Wilbur Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin and Larry Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Edison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.micfarris.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like I said in an earlier post, I thought this week&#8217;s Newsweek had a lot of great stuff&#8230;  Here are two articles with a scientific bent that I thought were neat. 
The first article is by Fareed Zakaria, who asks Is America Losing Its Mojo?  Zakaria points to three tidals waves of innovation that made America the world leaders in innovation. 
The first was a wave of deconstruction in Europe in the aftermath of World War II &#8211; while Europe spent most of its resources rebuilding to get back to where they ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like I said <a title="Odd Stats on Sarah Palin" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/odd-stats-on-sarah-palin/" target="_blank">in an earlier post</a>, I thought this week&#8217;s Newsweek had a lot of great stuff&#8230;  Here are two articles with a scientific bent that I thought were neat. </p>
<p>The first <a title="Is America Losing Its Mojo?" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/222836" target="_blank">article</a> is by Fareed Zakaria, who asks <em>Is America Losing Its Mojo?</em>  Zakaria points to three tidals waves of innovation that made America the world leaders in innovation. </p>
<p>The first was a wave of deconstruction in Europe in the aftermath of World War II &#8211; while Europe spent most of its resources rebuilding to get back to where they were before, America had the opportunity to push ahead with little competition.</p>
<p>The second wave, which was related to the first, was the influx of immigrants that fled Europe and took up residence in America&#8217;s universities and research centers.</p>
<p>The third wave came as a result of massive government funding, which led to and created markets for innovations such as the microprocessor, global positioning satellites, and the development of the Internet.</p>
<p>I see Zakaria&#8217;s point, but I&#8217;m not sure if America&#8217;s lead in the innovation space is really dead.  The the creation of the personal computer and the drive to use the Internet (and the software industries that came as a result) were American innovations, were distinct from these three waves, and changed the planet.</p>
<p>But what I did find interesting from this article was the list of great scientists that helped position America as the world&#8217;s innovation leader.  Here&#8217;s who was listed:</p>
<p><strong>Thomas Edison</strong> (1847-1931) &#8211; <em>Lightbulbs, phonograph</em><br />
<strong>Henry Ford</strong> (1863-1947) &#8211; <em>Assembly line<br />
</em><strong>George Washington Carver</strong> (c. 1864-1943) &#8211; <em>Crop rotation</em><br />
<strong>Orville</strong> (1871-1948) and <strong>Wilbur</strong> (1867-1912) <strong>Wright</strong> &#8211; <em>Airplane<br />
</em><strong>Willis Carver</strong> (1876-1950) &#8211; <em>Air conditioning</em><br />
<strong>Albert Einstein</strong> (1879-1955) &#8211; <em>Theory of relativity</em><br />
<strong>Charles Richard Drew</strong> (1940-50) &#8211; <em>Blood bank<br />
</em><strong>J. Robert Oppenheimer</strong> (1904-67) &#8211; <em>Atomic bomb</em><br />
<strong>Jonas Salk</strong> (1914-95) &#8211; <em>Polio vaccine</em><br />
<strong>Marion Donovan</strong> (1917-98) &#8211; <em>Disposable diapers<br />
</em><strong>Stephanie Kwolek</strong> (1923-  ) &#8211; <em>Kevlar</em><br />
<strong>James Watson</strong> (1928-  ) &#8211; <em>Structure of DNA<br />
</em><strong>Arthur Fry</strong> (1931-  ) &#8211; <em>Post-its<br />
</em><strong>Sergey Brin</strong> (1973-  ) and <strong>Larry Page</strong> (1973-  ) &#8211; <em>Google</em><br />
<strong>Ed Moses</strong> (1949-  ) &#8211; <em>Nuclear fusion</em> (which is the subject of the next article&#8230;)</p>
<p>The second <a title="Could This Lump Power the Planet?" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/222792" target="_blank">article</a> is by Daniel Lyons (aka <a title="The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs" href="http://www.fakesteve.net/" target="_blank">Fake Steve Jobs</a> &#8211; who hates Jobs, and I posted about his article on the iPhone <a title="Apple and 1984 All Over Again?" href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/apple-and-1984-all-over-again/" target="_blank">here</a>&#8230;) is on the quest for nuclear fusion power. </p>
<p>Nuclear fusion is the holy grail of energy, where a small pellet of deuterium and tritium (which are isotopes of hydrogen) hit with big lasers harnesses the energy-making power of the Sun.  The byproduct, as opposed to the radioactive waste of nuclear fission reactors or the greenhouse gases associated with burning fossil fuels, would merely be helium.</p>
<p>From the article, &#8220;<em>Fusion proponents claim that 10 gallons of water could produce as much energy as a supertanker of oil.</em>&#8220;</p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/01/lights-seen-from-faraway-planet/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Light Seen From Faraway Planet</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/apple-and-1984-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Apple and 1984 all over again?&#8230;</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/05/7-quick-qa-tips/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">7 Quick Q&#038;A Tips</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2010/03/why-nbaers-dont-shoot-underhand/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Why NBAers Don&#8217;t Shoot Underhand</a></li><li><a href="http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/the-perfect-is-the-enemy-of-the-good/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Perfect is the Enemy of the Good</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.micfarris.com/2009/11/american-innovation-and-pellet-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
